Over the course of my career, I've defined at least three different kinds of poker rebound. I'm sure you'll forgive me if I have the temerity to define yet another :-) In earlier incarnations of the definition, I was fixated on the requirement that a rebound be a losing session followed by a winning one. Pas du tout, now say I :-) My latest definition of poker rebound cares only about the profit differential between two consecutive sessions; as long as the second session showed a greater profit than the first, that qualifies as a rebound, even if both sessions were losing ones. By this new definition, I had a great session last night. I had a rebound of $456,400, which is certainly nothing to sneeze at.
style flavor buy_in entry players hands place winnings
SNG NLHE 88000 12000 6 29 2 184800
SNG 8-Game 44000 6000 6 157 1 171600
SNG NLHE 88000 12000 6 10 5 0
SNG NLHE 88000 12000 6 55 3 0
SNG 8-Game 44000 6000 6 118 3 0
delta: $-43,600
Sit and go no limit hold'em balance: $2,234,440
balance: $10,000,804
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment